Tuesday, February 15, 2011
"How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world." Anne Frank
Most of this is just coincidentally happening at about the same time, but I think it also helps that I worked full time all through J-term, so I have a bunch of money. It's so much easier to be charitable when you have money.
All of these good actions got me thinking about how easy it is to be charitable in the world now. Feed My Starving Children came to us, and I just had to walk across a parking lot to get there. People table for the Red Thread Movement outside the Caf, so I can be charitable on my way to lunch. People make facebook events inviting us to send them money through the POs and we will get some mittens! How convenient! Maybe it's just the environment at a small liberal arts college that we want to help people, but I don't think it's exactly hard to help the world outside of Gustavus either. I mean, I ordered my Toms online and so could anyone else.
And then that made me think about why people do good things for the world. And I thought about all the things I've gotten for my charitableness. A bracelet, a red thread, 2 pairs of shoes, a 8x10 print... I got paid for the organizational things I did for the silent auction, and my boss offered to pay my for working at the Feed My Starving Children event too. When you loan someone money through Kiva, you eventually get paid back. Not to mention that I got to feel really good about myself. So... do people buy Toms because they want a pair of shoes or because they want to help people who need shoes? Maybe both.
I recently read a book which talked about the religious tradition of tithing. The point of tithing 10% of your income (or whatever percent) is that you are supposed to feel the loss but recognize that it is OK and it is helping people. It helps make you less selfish. Nowadays, when you do something charitable, do you feel the loss? Do people really care about helping the world or do they need to get something out of it for it to be worth their time and money?
-Darcy
Friday, February 11, 2011
You Can't Frolic Through A Forest of Baby Trees.
I was eating breakfast with a few friends (has anyone ever made the observation of how similar Reese's Puffs look to dog food?) and we were talking about someone's Adolescent Lit class. They're reading "Are you there, God? It's me, Margaret", which is essentially a preteen bemoaning the late coming of adolescence. Someone at the table mentioned how all of the guys in the class must feel embarrassed to read this book, and I was thinking.... why?
What makes a book an exclusively "girls'" book or exclusively "guys'" book? True, the aforementioned book does discuss many feminine issues, but there's no reason that males can’t get something out of it or enjoy reading it. There seems to be a weird standard or expectation when it comes to things like books (and movies, clothes, and many others). I mean, it appears to be perfectly "acceptable" for girls to enjoy and/or be obsessed with Lord of the Rings, James Bond books/films, etc, whereas if you reverse the gender roles, it’s thought of as uncomfortable or odd.
This is in no way a blanket statement though. I know that some men are manly enough to proclaim, “Yes! I do enjoy a romantic comedy every now and then!”. This stereotype is being reversed even as I type. However, it still exists.
On a side note, I enjoy frolicking in forests, especially in the winter time while it is snowing. Imagine though, if your school decides to grow a new deciduous forest on campus. How would you frolic through baby trees?
One cannot.
-Emily
Thursday, February 10, 2011
Is Bigger Better?
But that's just my two cents.
-Ashley
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
This person has walked THEIR goat today. Have you?
Thank you, Katie! :)
Your Very Own Champion Time-Killer,
Anna
Question 2.
Seriously, though. Who was the first Homo sapien to look at a chicken that just layed an egg and think, "Hey! Look what just came out of that chicken! I wonder if it tastes good..."
Disclaimer: I have nothing at all against eggs or chickens. They are nutritious and quite delicious when cooked properly. This question is meant to be asked in all innocence.
I'm sure that many animals have been eating eggs for almost all of history, but who was the first current human to think that eating an egg would be a good idea? And how did they think to cook it (or not)?
Innocently wondering,
Anna
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast" - Oscar Wilde
Rice Cakes
And the thing about these rice cakes (I'm on my 2nd at this point) is that they literally taste like nothing. I swear, they are the least flavorful thing ever invented. Which leads me to the question: Why the hell were rice cakes invented?!?
Perhaps travelers on the Oregon trial were desperate for an easy-to-transport flavorless snack. Or maybe they were invented to fill the stomachs of starving, flavor-hating Irishmen during the potato famine. Or perhaps they were invented by the people inventing Metabolic Detoxifications so they could turn a profit on the smallest flavor-investment possible! I sense a conspiracy!
In any case, whoever thought that this would be a good idea was crazy. I have literally no idea who would want to consume 70 flavorless calories unless of course they were starving to death (much like I am now). These are probably the hardest things in the world to market. Which I guess is why you don't really see commercials for "New Extra-Bland Flavor Rice Cakes". You do see commercials for rice cakes covered in sugar. Which sounds really good right now. Anyway, the point of my little rant is that if you were planning on investing in a bag of Lundberg's Gluten Free, Vegan, Whole Grain Brown Rice Rice Cakes... I would suggest that you not.
Instead, you should invest in these delightful Rice Chips I found, also thanks to the good people at Lundberg. The rice chips are covered in sea salt and are incredibly similar to potato chips. They are wheat free, gluten free and AWESOME. Seriously, I will probably keep eating them even after Thursday. The Rice Cakes will not be so fortunate.
Enjoy something bland today. In honor of all of those starving, flavor-hating Irishmen.
Darcy
